<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googleopoly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/</link>
	<description>SEO Topics, points, points of view, and items to ponder found across the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Googleopoly Conspiracy Theorists with Programming Expertise Needed! &#171; SEO Chatter: What&#8217;s the buzz, man?</title>
		<link>http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Googleopoly Conspiracy Theorists with Programming Expertise Needed! &#171; SEO Chatter: What&#8217;s the buzz, man?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] on the concept of the Googleopoly with so many current advancements from SEs and the recent release of GChrome. Believe it or not, from those seemingly tangential writings, I was headed in a very specific [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the concept of the Googleopoly with so many current advancements from SEs and the recent release of GChrome. Believe it or not, from those seemingly tangential writings, I was headed in a very specific [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seochatter</title>
		<link>http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>seochatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, Thai. I&#039;m a Firefox addict (mostly for the add-ons) because Mozilla did the Open Source thing *first*. I appreciate Google&#039;s work (to prove it, I think I&#039;ll use GChrome for WordPress, permanently!) and think that they&#039;ve done a bang-up job, but until developers grace GChrome with the same add-ons and extensions as Firefox, my loyalties will, very much, lie with Mozilla.

Although, I think you&#039;re on to something as far as IE&#039;s next release and it&#039;s AdWords &#039;management&#039; and GChrome&#039;s &#039;accidently precipitated&#039; release. However, I think the dust will have to settle a bit before we see who busted who&#039;s bubble.

Side Note: Google did not develop GChrome to have any preference for AdWords or Search Engine default. Google truly made GChrome as un-proprietary as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, Thai. I&#8217;m a Firefox addict (mostly for the add-ons) because Mozilla did the Open Source thing *first*. I appreciate Google&#8217;s work (to prove it, I think I&#8217;ll use GChrome for WordPress, permanently!) and think that they&#8217;ve done a bang-up job, but until developers grace GChrome with the same add-ons and extensions as Firefox, my loyalties will, very much, lie with Mozilla.</p>
<p>Although, I think you&#8217;re on to something as far as IE&#8217;s next release and it&#8217;s AdWords &#8216;management&#8217; and GChrome&#8217;s &#8216;accidently precipitated&#8217; release. However, I think the dust will have to settle a bit before we see who busted who&#8217;s bubble.</p>
<p>Side Note: Google did not develop GChrome to have any preference for AdWords or Search Engine default. Google truly made GChrome as un-proprietary as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thai SEO</title>
		<link>http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Thai SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>IE is going to offer users a chance to set IE to &quot;private&quot;, which will block Google&#039;s Adwords advertising then Google Chrome born. Google Chrome is clean and fast. But I love Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE is going to offer users a chance to set IE to &#8220;private&#8221;, which will block Google&#8217;s Adwords advertising then Google Chrome born. Google Chrome is clean and fast. But I love Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seochatter</title>
		<link>http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>seochatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seochatter.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googleopoly/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I can say that the admin side of WordPress seems to be speedier on GChrome, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can say that the admin side of WordPress seems to be speedier on GChrome, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
